Ballpark vs Lyssna
Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.
The verdict
Both Ballpark and Lyssna are credible user research tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.
Ballpark — Surveys, interviews, and usability tests.
Lyssna — User research and testing platform.
Ballpark vs Lyssna: side by side
| Dimension | Ballpark | Lyssna |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free – $80/mo | Free – $75/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Best for | Designers, Product Teams | Designers, Product Teams |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.5/5 |
Ballpark key facts
- Vendor
- Ballpark
- Pricing
- Freemium — Free – $80/mo
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- Web
- Best for
- Designers, Product Teams
- Editor rating
- 4.6 / 5
- Founded
- 2020
- Headquarters
- London, UK
Lyssna key facts
- Vendor
- Lyssna
- Pricing
- Freemium — Free – $75/mo
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- Web
- Best for
- Designers, Product Teams
- Editor rating
- 4.5 / 5
- Founded
- 2008
- Headquarters
- Melbourne, Australia
Frequently asked questions
Is Ballpark better than Lyssna?
Neither is universally better — Ballpark edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.
Is Ballpark or Lyssna cheaper?
Ballpark is the more affordable of the two to get started, at free – $80/mo. Ballpark starts at free – $80/mo; Lyssna starts at free – $75/mo.
Can Ballpark replace Lyssna?
Yes for most teams — both are user research tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.