Bitbucket vs Gitea
Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.
The verdict
Both Bitbucket and Gitea are credible version control tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.
Bitbucket — Git for teams, with built-in CI/CD.
Choose Gitea if you'd rather have a higher overall rating (4.6/5). Lightweight self-hosted Git.
Bitbucket vs Gitea: side by side
| Dimension | Bitbucket | Gitea |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free – $3/user/mo | Free – $3/user/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Best for | Atlassian Teams, Enterprise | Self Hosters, Developers |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Self Hosted, Web |
| Rating | 4.3/5 | 4.6/5Winner |
Bitbucket key facts
- Vendor
- Atlassian
- Pricing
- Freemium — Free – $3/user/mo
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- Web, Api
- Best for
- Atlassian Teams, Enterprise
- Editor rating
- 4.3 / 5
- Founded
- 2008
- Headquarters
- Sydney, Australia
Gitea key facts
- Vendor
- Gitea
- Pricing
- Freemium — Free – $3/user/mo
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- Self Hosted, Web
- Best for
- Self Hosters, Developers
- Editor rating
- 4.6 / 5
- Founded
- 2016
- Headquarters
- Open source
Frequently asked questions
Is Bitbucket better than Gitea?
Neither is universally better — Gitea edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.
Is Bitbucket or Gitea cheaper?
Bitbucket is the more affordable of the two to get started, at free – $3/user/mo. Bitbucket starts at free – $3/user/mo; Gitea starts at free – $3/user/mo.
Can Bitbucket replace Gitea?
Yes for most teams — both are version control tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.