softwares.com

ClockShark vs Workforce.com

Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.

Time tracking for field teams.

Workforce management for shift work.

The verdict

Both ClockShark and Workforce.com are credible time tracking tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.

Choose ClockShark if you want a lower starting price (from $8/mo) and a higher overall rating (4.7/5). Time tracking for field teams.

Workforce.com — Workforce management for shift work.

ClockShark vs Workforce.com: side by side

DimensionClockSharkWorkforce.com
Starting priceFrom $8/moWinnerCustom
Free planNoNo
Pricing modelSubscriptionSubscription
Best forConstruction, Field ServiceRetail, Hospitality
PlatformsWeb, Ios, Android, ApiWeb, Ios, Android, Api
Rating4.7/5Winner4.4/5

ClockShark key facts

Vendor
ClockShark
Pricing
Subscription — From $8/mo
Free tier
No
Platforms
Web, Ios, Android, Api
Best for
Construction, Field Service
Editor rating
4.7 / 5
Founded
2014
Headquarters
Chico, CA, USA

Workforce.com key facts

Vendor
Workforce.com
Pricing
Subscription — Custom
Free tier
No
Platforms
Web, Ios, Android, Api
Best for
Retail, Hospitality
Editor rating
4.4 / 5
Founded
2012
Headquarters
Chicago, IL, USA

Frequently asked questions

Is ClockShark better than Workforce.com?

Neither is universally better — ClockShark edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.

Is ClockShark or Workforce.com cheaper?

ClockShark is the more affordable of the two to get started, at from $8/mo. ClockShark starts at from $8/mo; Workforce.com starts at custom.

Can ClockShark replace Workforce.com?

Yes for most teams — both are time tracking tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.