Cursor vs Cody by Sourcegraph
Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.
AI coding assistant with codebase context
The verdict
Both Cursor and Cody by Sourcegraph are credible ai coding tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.
Choose Cursor if you want a higher overall rating (4.5/5). The AI-first code editor.
Cody by Sourcegraph — AI coding assistant with codebase context
Cursor vs Cody by Sourcegraph: side by side
| Dimension | Cursor | Cody by Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free – $20/mo | Free – $9/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Best for | Developers, Ai First Teams | Developers, Enterprise |
| Platforms | Mac, Windows, Linux | Api, Web |
| Rating | 4.5/5Winner | 4.3/5 |
Cursor key facts
- Vendor
- Anysphere
- Pricing
- Freemium — Free – $20/mo
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- Mac, Windows, Linux
- Best for
- Developers, Ai First Teams
- Editor rating
- 4.5 / 5
- Founded
- 2022
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, CA, USA
Cody by Sourcegraph key facts
- Vendor
- Sourcegraph
- Pricing
- Freemium — Free – $9/mo
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- Api, Web
- Best for
- Developers, Enterprise
- Editor rating
- 4.3 / 5
- Founded
- 2022
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, USA
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor better than Cody by Sourcegraph?
Neither is universally better — Cursor edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.
Is Cursor or Cody by Sourcegraph cheaper?
Cursor is the more affordable of the two to get started, at free – $20/mo. Cursor starts at free – $20/mo; Cody by Sourcegraph starts at free – $9/mo.
Can Cursor replace Cody by Sourcegraph?
Yes for most teams — both are ai coding tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.