softwares.com

Harvest vs Hubstaff

Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.

Time tracking and invoicing.

Time tracking with productivity monitoring.

The verdict

Both Harvest and Hubstaff are credible time tracking tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.

Harvest — Time tracking and invoicing.

Hubstaff — Time tracking with productivity monitoring.

Harvest vs Hubstaff: side by side

DimensionHarvestHubstaff
Starting priceFree – $11/seat/moFree – $7/user/mo
Free planYesYes
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Best forAgencies, FreelancersRemote Teams, Field Teams
PlatformsWeb, Mac, Windows, Ios, AndroidWeb, Windows, Mac, Linux, Ios, Android
Rating4.5/54.5/5

Harvest key facts

Vendor
Harvest
Pricing
Freemium — Free – $11/seat/mo
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web, Mac, Windows, Ios, Android
Best for
Agencies, Freelancers
Editor rating
4.5 / 5
Founded
2006
Headquarters
New York, NY, USA

Hubstaff key facts

Vendor
Hubstaff
Pricing
Freemium — Free – $7/user/mo
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web, Windows, Mac, Linux, Ios, Android
Best for
Remote Teams, Field Teams
Editor rating
4.5 / 5
Founded
2012
Headquarters
Indianapolis, IN, USA

Frequently asked questions

Is Harvest better than Hubstaff?

Neither is universally better — Harvest edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.

Is Harvest or Hubstaff cheaper?

Harvest is the more affordable of the two to get started, at free – $11/seat/mo. Harvest starts at free – $11/seat/mo; Hubstaff starts at free – $7/user/mo.

Can Harvest replace Hubstaff?

Yes for most teams — both are time tracking tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.