softwares.com

Jamf vs ThreatLocker

Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.

Apple enterprise management.

Application allowlisting and zero trust endpoint control

The verdict

Both Jamf and ThreatLocker are credible device management tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.

Jamf — Apple enterprise management.

Choose ThreatLocker if you'd rather have a longer free trial (30 days) and a higher overall rating (4.8/5). Application allowlisting and zero trust endpoint control

Jamf vs ThreatLocker: side by side

DimensionJamfThreatLocker
Starting priceCustomCustom
Free planNoNo
Free trial30 daysWinner
Pricing modelSubscriptionSubscription
Best forEnterprise, EducationSmb, Msp, It Teams
PlatformsWeb, Mac, IosWindows, Mac, Linux, Api
Rating4.5/54.8/5Winner

Jamf key facts

Vendor
Jamf
Pricing
Subscription — Custom
Free tier
No
Platforms
Web, Mac, Ios
Best for
Enterprise, Education
Editor rating
4.5 / 5
Founded
2002
Headquarters
Minneapolis, MN, USA

ThreatLocker key facts

Vendor
ThreatLocker
Pricing
Subscription — Custom
Free tier
Free trial (30 days)
Platforms
Windows, Mac, Linux, Api
Best for
Smb, Msp, It Teams
Editor rating
4.8 / 5
Founded
2017
Headquarters
Orlando, USA

Frequently asked questions

Is Jamf better than ThreatLocker?

Neither is universally better — ThreatLocker edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.

Is Jamf or ThreatLocker cheaper?

Jamf is the more affordable of the two to get started, at custom. Jamf starts at custom; ThreatLocker starts at custom.

Can Jamf replace ThreatLocker?

Yes for most teams — both are device management tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.