Jane vs Clockwise Calendar (Woven)
Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.
Smart calendar with scheduling links and templates.
The verdict
Both Jane and Clockwise Calendar (Woven) are credible healthcare tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.
Choose Jane if you want a longer free trial (14 days) and a higher overall rating (4.8/5). Practice management you'll love.
Choose Clockwise Calendar (Woven) if you'd rather have a lower starting price (free – $15/user/mo) and a free plan to start on. Smart calendar with scheduling links and templates.
Jane vs Clockwise Calendar (Woven): side by side
| Dimension | Jane | Clockwise Calendar (Woven) |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $79/mo | Free – $15/user/moWinner |
| Free plan | No | YesWinner |
| Free trial | 14 daysWinner | — |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Freemium |
| Best for | Clinics, Allied Health | Professionals, Consultants |
| Platforms | Web, Ios | Web, Mac, Ios |
| Rating | 4.8/5Winner | 4.2/5 |
Jane key facts
- Vendor
- Jane Software
- Pricing
- Subscription — From $79/mo
- Free tier
- Free trial (14 days)
- Platforms
- Web, Ios
- Best for
- Clinics, Allied Health
- Editor rating
- 4.8 / 5
- Founded
- 2011
- Headquarters
- North Vancouver, Canada
Clockwise Calendar (Woven) key facts
- Vendor
- Woven
- Pricing
- Freemium — Free – $15/user/mo
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- Web, Mac, Ios
- Best for
- Professionals, Consultants
- Editor rating
- 4.2 / 5
- Founded
- 2017
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, USA
Frequently asked questions
Is Jane better than Clockwise Calendar (Woven)?
Neither is universally better — Jane edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.
Is Jane or Clockwise Calendar (Woven) cheaper?
Clockwise Calendar (Woven) is the more affordable of the two to get started, at free – $15/user/mo. Jane starts at from $79/mo; Clockwise Calendar (Woven) starts at free – $15/user/mo.
Can Jane replace Clockwise Calendar (Woven)?
Yes for most teams — both are healthcare tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.