softwares.com

Living Security vs ThreatLocker

Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.

Human risk management platform

Application allowlisting and zero trust endpoint control

The verdict

Both Living Security and ThreatLocker are credible security privacy tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.

Living Security — Human risk management platform

Choose ThreatLocker if you'd rather have a longer free trial (30 days), broader platform coverage and a higher overall rating (4.8/5). Application allowlisting and zero trust endpoint control

Living Security vs ThreatLocker: side by side

DimensionLiving SecurityThreatLocker
Starting priceCustomCustom
Free planNoNo
Free trial30 daysWinner
Pricing modelSubscriptionSubscription
Best forEnterprise, Security TeamsSmb, Msp, It Teams
PlatformsWeb, ApiWindows, Mac, Linux, ApiWinner
Rating4.6/54.8/5Winner

Living Security key facts

Vendor
Living Security
Pricing
Subscription — Custom
Free tier
No
Platforms
Web, Api
Best for
Enterprise, Security Teams
Editor rating
4.6 / 5
Founded
2017
Headquarters
Austin, USA

ThreatLocker key facts

Vendor
ThreatLocker
Pricing
Subscription — Custom
Free tier
Free trial (30 days)
Platforms
Windows, Mac, Linux, Api
Best for
Smb, Msp, It Teams
Editor rating
4.8 / 5
Founded
2017
Headquarters
Orlando, USA

Frequently asked questions

Is Living Security better than ThreatLocker?

Neither is universally better — ThreatLocker edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.

Is Living Security or ThreatLocker cheaper?

Living Security is the more affordable of the two to get started, at custom. Living Security starts at custom; ThreatLocker starts at custom.

Can Living Security replace ThreatLocker?

Yes for most teams — both are security privacy tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.