Material Security vs Mimecast
Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.
Email security and data protection for cloud mailboxes
The verdict
Both Material Security and Mimecast are credible email security tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.
Material Security — Email security and data protection for cloud mailboxes
Mimecast — Email security, archiving, and continuity
Material Security vs Mimecast: side by side
| Dimension | Material Security | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom | Custom |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription |
| Best for | Enterprise, Mid Market, Security Teams | Smb, Enterprise, Security Teams |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, Api |
| Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.4/5 |
Material Security key facts
- Vendor
- Material Security
- Pricing
- Subscription — Custom
- Free tier
- No
- Platforms
- Web, Api
- Best for
- Enterprise, Mid Market, Security Teams
- Editor rating
- 4.6 / 5
- Founded
- 2017
- Headquarters
- Redwood City, USA
Mimecast key facts
- Vendor
- Mimecast
- Pricing
- Subscription — Custom
- Free tier
- No
- Platforms
- Web, Api
- Best for
- Smb, Enterprise, Security Teams
- Editor rating
- 4.4 / 5
- Founded
- 2003
- Headquarters
- London, UK
Frequently asked questions
Is Material Security better than Mimecast?
Neither is universally better — Material Security edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.
Is Material Security or Mimecast cheaper?
Material Security is the more affordable of the two to get started, at custom. Material Security starts at custom; Mimecast starts at custom.
Can Material Security replace Mimecast?
Yes for most teams — both are email security tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.