Service Autopilot vs Time To Pet
Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.
Automation-first software for field service businesses
Pet sitting and dog walking business software
The verdict
Both Service Autopilot and Time To Pet are credible field service tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.
Service Autopilot — Automation-first software for field service businesses
Choose Time To Pet if you'd rather have a lower starting price (from $25/mo), a longer free trial (14 days) and a higher overall rating (4.8/5). Pet sitting and dog walking business software
Service Autopilot vs Time To Pet: side by side
| Dimension | Service Autopilot | Time To Pet |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $47/mo | From $25/moWinner |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | — | 14 daysWinner |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription |
| Best for | Lawn Care, Field Service Companies | Pet Sitting, Dog Walking |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android | Web, Ios, Android |
| Rating | 4.2/5 | 4.8/5Winner |
Service Autopilot key facts
- Vendor
- Service Autopilot (Xplor)
- Pricing
- Subscription — From $47/mo
- Free tier
- No
- Platforms
- Web, Ios, Android
- Best for
- Lawn Care, Field Service Companies
- Editor rating
- 4.2 / 5
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Dallas, USA
Time To Pet key facts
- Vendor
- Time To Pet
- Pricing
- Subscription — From $25/mo
- Free tier
- Free trial (14 days)
- Platforms
- Web, Ios, Android
- Best for
- Pet Sitting, Dog Walking
- Editor rating
- 4.8 / 5
- Founded
- 2014
- Headquarters
- Austin, USA
Frequently asked questions
Is Service Autopilot better than Time To Pet?
Neither is universally better — Time To Pet edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.
Is Service Autopilot or Time To Pet cheaper?
Time To Pet is the more affordable of the two to get started, at from $25/mo. Service Autopilot starts at from $47/mo; Time To Pet starts at from $25/mo.
Can Service Autopilot replace Time To Pet?
Yes for most teams — both are field service tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.